Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Support the Christians of Iraq

Please pray for the persecuted Christians of Iraq and indeed please urge your Congressmen to pass the proposed resolution noted below: in particular, Anglicans, who sponsored the Mission of the Archbishop of Canterbury to the Assyrian Church of the East at the beginning of the twentieth century, should stand in solidarity with our bothers and sisters of the Assyrian, Syriac and Chaldean Christian traditions in Iraq, as they face at this very moment what is possibly the worst persecution in their venerable 2,000 year history.

The United States Conference of [Roman] Catholic Bishops urged Congress on Nov. 29 to pass a resolution condemning religious violence in Iraq, and insisting on better protection for Christians and other minority faiths.

Two representatives of the conference, Archbishop Jose H. Gomez of Los Angeles and Bishop Howard J. Hubbard of Albany in New York, wrote to the sponsors of House Resolution 1725, in their respective positions as the national chairmen for migration and social justice. They commended the seven sponsors of House Resolution 1725, and called for the act's immediate passage.

Rep. Chris Smith (R – N.J.), a [Roman] Catholic and an outspoken advocate for international religious freedom, introduced the resolution along with six co-sponsors from both the Republican and Democratic parties. The proposal follows a wave of attacks targeting Iraqi Christians this fall, the worst of which left over 50 worshipers dead at Baghdad's Cathedral of Our Lady of Salvation on Oct. 31.

Several Iraqi Christians now living in the U.S.--including a board member of the international charity Iraqi Christians In Need, and a former seminary professor of two priests killed at Our Lady of Salvation– have told CNA that the government is not doing enough to stop an epidemic of violence that has forced more than half of the country's Christians to flee.

Although Rep. Smith voted in favor of the American invasion of Iraq –which Pope John Paul II warned would destabilize the region and lead to sectarian violence– he has also demonstrated a willingness to speak out against cases of abuse or negligence by the ruling Iraqi government. Last year, he co-sponsored a resolution condemning Iraqi security forces' attacks on a group of Iranian refugees.

Archbishop Gomez and Bishop Hubbard praised Rep. Smith's introduction of HR 1725, as a means to “focus attention on the situation of the vulnerable religious communities in Iraq.” They particularly appreciated its call for a “comprehensive plan” to prevent religious persecution, and to increase the representation of Christians and other minority groups in Iraq's government.

The bishops described the attack at Our Lady of Salvation, along with other assaults intended to drive Iraqi Christians from their homes and businesses, as “horrific reminders of the appalling lack of security that has condemned many in Iraq to live in fear.” The resolution expresses concern for Iraqi refugees, urging that barriers to their resettlement or return be lifted.

“We sincerely hope that H. Res. 1725 will be adopted quickly by the House of Representatives as we believe it will help improve security for all Iraqis, especially Christians and other vulnerable minorities,” the bishops wrote, noting that the resolution's proposals would help the troubled country achieve peace and address its refugee crisis.

3 comments:

Death Bredon said...

One thing that was conveniently overlooked in the demonization of the Baathist in Iraq is that they were the only major political party in Iraq that respected and protected Christianity. In sum, the US de-Baathification policy--which was adopted AFTER the invasion, and which had nothing to do with Saddam Hussein personally, WMDs, or terrorism--was necessarily an anti-Christian policy. Personally, I don't think that the MSM has done enough (1) to distinguish between the invasion decision, which was one thing, and our de-Baathification program, which was another thing altogether; and (2) to critique the latter decision on its own merits.

Jay Scott Newman said...

A small correction. In your text you insert an editorial correction to the title of the USCCB, making it the United States Conference of (Roman) Catholic Bishops, but that is erroneous. It is most emphatically not a conference of Roman Catholic bishops, parenthetically or otherwise. Bishops of every Catholic Church sui iuris who have jurisdiction in the United States are full members of the USCCB, and they are not Roman Catholics. They, to take but a few examples, are Maronite Catholics, Greek Melkite Catholics, Ukranian Catholics, Chaldean Catholics, Syro-Malabar Catholics, but they are not Roman Catholics. The USCCB is named as it is for a reason, and it is an accurate reflection of its true identity. To take another example, the Syrian Catholic Cathedral which was attacked in Baghdad is not a Roman Catholic church, but it is a completely Catholic Church -- made so, in its own self-undestanding by being in full communion with the Bishop and Church of Rome, but that does not make the Syrian Catholic Church a Roman Catholic Church. Just a Catholic Church.

Fr. David F. Coady said...

Fr. Newman is somewhat correct in his statement regarding the USCCB. Maybe a more accurate name would be: The United State Conference of Catholic Bishops Who Are In Communion With the Holy See of Rome. Eastern Orthodox and Anglicans are also "Catholic."

Reflection: The 2024 APA Clergy Retreat on G3 Unity

Reflection: The 2024 APA Clergy Retreat on G3 Unity